URBAN PHILOSOPHER
Conscience Laureate

Tuesday, January 24, 2012

Robert  Felton, a contributing reporter to the Austin Weekly news, gave me permission to reprint his story about Justice Joy Cunningham's race for the Illinois Supreme Court.

Joy Cunningham looks to become first black woman on Illinois Supreme Court


By ROBERT FELTON
Contributing Reporter


Joy Cunningham knows a little something about making history.

The North Sider did that 8 years ago, becoming the first black woman president of the Chicago Bar Association. Her sights are set on another first and even higher position - becoming the first black woman ever elected to Illinois' Supreme Court. Cunningham, who sits on the state's Appellate Court, is running in the March 20 primary for the vacant Cook County seat on the high court.
Along with possibly making history, she also wants to provide of voice and perspective on the court she says has been lacking recently.

"I think it's important that the Supreme Court of Illinois reflects the variety of experience of those it represents," Cunningham said. "There are 13 million people in Illinois, and they have diverse backgrounds. I believe I bring a new perspective to the court that would benefit Illinois as a whole."

Cunningham, who lives in the Andersonville neighborhood on the North Side, was inspired to run following the retirement of Justice Thomas Fitzgerald last year. The vacancy presented a rare opportunity for prospective candidates, given that justices are usually elected to 10-year terms and usually run unopposed. Normally, seats open up because of retirements, deaths or impeachment.

Cunningham has been endorsed by U.S. Rep. Danny Davis (D-7th) and Illinois Secretary of State Jesse White. She's running against four other challengers, including Mary Jane Theis, a sitting Supreme Court justice who was appointed to a two-tear term in 2010. Theis is considered the front-runner.

She has the backing of Fitzgerald, and since May 2011 has raised more than $830,000 for the primary, according to campaign finance records on file with the Illinois State Board of Elections. Since June 2011, Cunningham has raised $342,000, according to the state board. Cunningham nevertheless feels she is the best choice.

"This process has almost always been a fairly straightforward one, with the outgoing judge naming his successor, who is then appointed without a serious challenge," she said.
"But I feel that the people should decide...It should not be a group of political figures handpicking a candidate to represent the interest of the entire state."

Cunningham's 35-year career began in her hometown of New York City. After graduating with a bachelor's degree in nursing from the City University of New York, she moved to Chicago in the early 1980s and worked as a critical care nurse.

She later attended John Marshall Law School and served as Loyola University's chief counsel for health care, and later as general counsel and senior vice president of the Northwestern Memorial Health Care System. She was elected the Illinois Appellate Court in 2006.

In 2004, Cunningham became the first black woman elected president of the 22,000-member Chicago Bar Association, the largest municipal bar association in the United States. She also serves on the board of directors of the Chicago Legal Clinic, which that provides legal counseling services to disadvantaged and underserved Chicago residents.

Its co-founder, Ed Grossman, says Cunningham's experience in both the private and public sectors make her uniquely qualified for the Supreme Court.

"What separates her, I think, is the variety of experience she brings to the table," he said. "She's worked with businesses, she's worked in management, she's worked with average Americans and corporations. She is very well-rounded in her experience."

A married mother of one, Cunningham said one of the most difficult aspects of campaigning is the amount of time she spends away from home. Her husband, she says, is very understanding of her schedule. But win or lose, she's looking forward to spending more time with her family after the election.

"Campaigning is never easy, but I have a wonderful support system at home that has encouraged me every step of the way."

Monday, January 23, 2012

AN ALDERMAN, A CITY INSPECTOR AND A CONTRACTOR WALKED INTO A BAR.



The title of this blog sounds like the start of a bad joke.   So does Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s latest Ethics Reform Task Force and in both instances the punch lines are very funny.

Emanuel announced his Ethics Reform Task Force  last week. “I created an Ethics Reform Task Force in order to recommend reforms to Chicago’s ethics ordinance and better serve taxpayers,” Emanuel said in a press release.   The Task Force also has a web site where citizens can have a public dialogue about ethics reform.  Or as the Mayor said, “This website will assist the … task force to assess the current ordinance, consider best practices across the nation and make recommendations to ensure appropriate oversight of government activity.”

So how is ethics reform a joke?  Maybe because currently the City of Chicago seems to have more Inspectors General and Boards of Ethics than there are bus stops.  And there are bus stops on every corner! And if it ain't working now, it is not going to start just because a new ethics reform group is created.

Chicago is also very fortunate to have the Better Government Association, an independent not-for profit organization  where citizens can report government fraud and abuse and hold elected officials accountable.

At the end of this blog, I have created links to some of those  investigative ethics groups which have been in existence for decades to make your reporting job easier.  If people aren’t already whistle blowing, what makes Emanuel think they will start blowing now?  He must be hoping for a happy ending that only comes following a visit to a massage parlor.  Or is it all just a mirage?

SOME CHICAGO INVESTIGATIVE GROUPS:










Thursday, January 19, 2012

TELLING THE TRUTH



CBS News conducted a random telephone poll, the results were published in the February issue of Vanity Fair, of 951 adults nationwide and one of the questions was, “Would most people you know kill their favorite pet for $1 million?  What about you?  The results of the poll, above, prove my point that people lie when asked difficult questions in phone surveys when they are talking to a human being who might be judgmental.  I guarantee you if people could answer that question anonymously, the poll results would be very different.


If I owned (owning is the operative word here because pets are considered personal property) a pet and got that offer, I know what I would do. Now that you are getting ready to write a comment of righteous indignation, let’s change the wording of the question a few times.

“Would you or most people you know kill their favorite pet for $1 million if the money were needed to buy a car that was essential for your job?  You see where I am going here?

“Would you or most people you know kill their favorite pet for $1 million if the money were needed to pay for the college education of their children?  Change your mind yet?
  
“Would you or most people you know kill their favorite pet for $1 million if the money were needed to pay for the medical care of a family member that would save the person’s life?  Now will you answer “Yes?”

We all have a tipping point where we would kill our beloved pet.  It is a horrible topic to think about, but respected CBS News posed the question, not me.  Now you know why I am frustrated by polls and surveys.  They never ask the reason why a person would answer a certain way.  And under the correct condition 100 percent of us would kill our favorite pet.  Unless it was Lassie!