URBAN PHILOSOPHER
Conscience Laureate

Friday, January 22, 2010

SKEWERED FOR DOING GOOD!

SKEWERED FOR DOING GOOD! Sometimes politicians just cannot win even when they are doing something good. We read story after story about free fall spending on “pork projects,” bloated no-bid contracts and deficit spending that skewers elected officials for not being fiscally responsible. Yet when some Chicago Aldermen decide not to spend all of their “menu money” ($1.32 million allotted to each Alderman for projects in their ward) immediately, the Sun Times castigates them. Sun Times City Hall political writer Fran Spielman wrote an “exposé” story about 13 Aldermen who were left with at least $500,000 of unused “menu money” at the end of 2009; including four with more than $1 million unspent. The casual reader of the story probably missed the line, “unspent money stays in an alderman's account for future use “ and believes instead that their Alderman did not properly allocate money for ward street repairs and other projects and the money is lost. Just because you have the money in the bank does not mean you have to spend it immediately! These castigated Aldermen are wise and have not haphazardly spent money as if it were burning a hole in their pockets and have prudently decided to apportion it as needed. What is wrong with that? In the story, Alderman Helen Schiller (46th ward) said she had not spent $1.15 million of her budget because she is deliberate. "I can spend the money. That's not the issue. The issue is I like to do it in a comprehensive manner.” Alderman Mary Ann Smith (48th ward), “acknowledged that she "hordes" most of her menu money to "seed" projects that "might not happen" otherwise. They include improving retail space in CTA Red Line stations, building dog parks, and enlarging the soon-to-be-built Edgewater Library. This is a very precious pool of money to me. With this menu money, I can make unusually good things happen. But, just because you've got it doesn't mean you need to spend it. There's no rush," she said. "Our neighborhood has a wish-list. It's our job to make it happen. If that means hoarding some of the money, I hang onto it. Every nickel is a prisoner." We should be holding a parade for Aldermen who want to expend money in a purposeful manner instead of grilling them about not spending it frivolously. At first, I was happy to read that my Alderman, Brendan Reilly (42nd ward), was first on the list with $1.3 million still left in his budget. I was proud of his prudence. Then I read what he wants to do with the money and I went ballistic! According to the Sun Times, Reilly wants to “nearly triple the number of downtown bike lanes and clearly delineate those lanes with a plastic green surface. But, the work can't begin until the Chicago Department of Transportation completes a study on the project. “I have done a number of blogs about hating how bicyclists ignore the rules of the road and are a menace to pedestrians and drivers. Their impertinence and disrespect is compounded because they know the Mayor loves them and they can get away with anything. Now I will have to worry about triple their number! I have already written to the Alderman’s office asking how I can testify against expanding the bicycle lanes but have not heard back yet. Look for a future blog on the subject as spring approaches.
The one day there is good news coming out of City Hall, the Sun Times chooses to run it as a negative piece. Since there are scandals of epic proportion occurring every day at City Hall, this story should have been front page with a smiley face—but good news doesn’t sell. It has to bleed to lead.

4 comments:

  1. Fan Club President Sue writes:

    "Politicians are always in a no win situation!"

    ReplyDelete
  2. Fan Club Assistant to the Traveling Secretary Kaz writes:

    "I think there would be well-deserved outrage if this was a use-it-or-lose it type of situation; if projects earmarked to receive
    such funding were being ignored while the money was mysteriously disappearing...!...and couldn't be accounted for (ahem, the supposed
    Denim-for-Dollars * I just made that up! * brew-haha currently in the news) or if a deadline was missed, whereas the aldermen would have needed to spend the money in their respective wards in order to receive matching funds.

    However, that doesn't appear to be the case...or outwardly appear...and
    as you called it, there's no selling papers with headlines that lead with the truth; i.e., Aldermen Behind In Spending Stay Ahead In Saving.


    Q: I'm guessing these funds are allowed to earn interest? If so, that would add even more money to the Menu Money savings accounts, no?

    Now...to play the other side of the coin...if aldermen are stockpiling
    money to the point where real ward improvements are being ignored and
    pie-in-the-sky projects are being envisioned...possibly the tripling of
    downtown bike lanes...or if they're saving it for their campaign (re)election war-chests, that's not good, either. My personal opinion:
    campaign money is to be earned via fundraisers, dinners, donations,
    requests, etc. Menu Money earmarked for ward improvements should be left to the ward, in a savings account at a reliable financial
    institution, no matter who is elected to serve that ward, and it should be left alone to keep earning interest until the need(s) of that ward
    arise.

    There's so much shenanigans goin' on, that people come to expect irresponsible behavior and misuse of funds from their elected officials. They simply sigh, shrug their shoulders and look the other way...oft
    times saying, "It's the Chicago way" or something similar. Well ya know
    what? These people need to start paying attention to what's going on
    and I think that's where an article like this comes in...it stirs the
    pot...even if the pot is empty! But I guess it's never a bad idea to
    keep an eye on government spending; i.e., treat it like it's one of our
    own utility bills or credit card statements. Start reading the fine
    print and find out what every line-item is for and why it's there. If
    money is being bled and not accounted for, raise hell and remove these
    people from office. If the elected official is doing a decent job and
    is on the up-and-up, but perhaps has a different vision for the use of
    that money, then the tax-paying voters in that ward need to voice their
    approval or disapproval accordingly.

    Sometimes a non-story IS the story, eh? "

    ReplyDelete
  3. Kaz made a good point about the interest in the unused money. Who gets that?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Kaz writesd: "You ROCK! I think it's so important for people to know what-up, ya know? I know that sometimes money has everything to do with it and then again, has nothing to do with it, but I laugh when I hear that the State of IL is on the verge of bankruptcy, or that Cook County can't balance the budget, or that the City of Chicago and/or Mayor Daley keeps saying we're out of money. But then you read that there IS some money...it's just not being spent...and I get it...but it's funny how's there's always money when they really, really, really, really, really want to pony up to the plate with it!"

    ReplyDelete