URBAN PHILOSOPHER
Conscience Laureate

Thursday, March 25, 2010

Common Senses Invades Chicago Politics

Common Senses Invades Chicago Politics A few weeks ago, Alderman Robert Fioretti (2nd Ward) was a guest of mine on the TV show Political Forum. While discussing the upcoming census and redistricting we talked about the weird geographic configuration of the ward boundaries. He pointed out that because of the oddly-shaped areas, city services could not be efficiently dispensed. He spoke of changing to a grid system for street cleaning pointing out how much sense that would make. That type of arrangement would save money and be more competent. He said he had been lobbying for it for years. Now, with Alderman Fioretti being the only proponent, Mayor Daley has announced a cost-cutting plan to change street sweeping from a ward-by-ward pattern to a grid system. "If this side is one ward -- of the street -- and that's the other side, we can only street clean one side one day and the other the other day.”It's called efficiency, saving money," Daley said.
What? Has common sense invaded Chicago politics for the first time? Could reform be next?
With 50 wards, 50 sweepers are needed. With the new grid system only 33 would be needed because of a smarter deployment of the equipment. Why would Alderman be so upset about a new arrangement that will employ 17 fewer sweeping machines and yet still provide the same level of service?
Fran Spielman’s story in the Sun Times quoted various Aldermen who don’t want to see a change.
It is taking control away from me. ... I want to keep control of that sweeper. I want to be able to keep control of the criticism that may come to me when they say that the streets are not clean,” said Ald. Willie Cochran (20th). “We have a lot of leaves. We have a lot of debris that has blown out of a garbage can. ... As I’m driving down the street and I see [trash] that needs to be taken care of, I can get on the phone and say, ‘Send a sweeper to this location.’ Under this proposal, we won’t have that luxury.”
Ald. Richard Mell (33rd) is equally concerned. “Sometimes you have a certain area that’s a lot dirtier than other areas. So, you ask the street sweeper to go back a couple times. Sometimes, you don’t have all the cars off that street and you send your guy out there to ring doorbells and get everybody off the street so the street sweeper can go back. Once they start on that grid system, you’re never gonna have control over it anymore,” Mell said.
Ald. Ed Smith (28th) added, “If you decrease the number of sweepers, you’re gonna have some problems with trying to get everything done, especially with us who’ve got these huge wards.”
In response to the Aldermen worried about the cleanliness of their particular ward, Daley said that ward-level street department superintendents will insure street sweepers remain responsive to local calls for cleaning.
To the Aldermen it’s not just a matter of who has control of the sweeper; it’s that some of their power is being taken away. What’s next? Garbage pick-up in grids? Sidewalk repair requests going straight to Streets & Sanitation? Parking permits and street closure application disseminated by the Department of Transportation? The Office of Special Events assigning use of the Jumping Jacks? The need for city services being assigned by the actual office that will fulfill the request?
If the city can be divided into 33 perfect grids for disbursement of city services; then it could be divided into 33 wards. So we are not talking about the loss of 17 sweepers, but the elimination of 17 Aldermen’s jobs. I think that is the real fear.
As Martin Luther King, Jr. said, “If a man is called to be a street sweeper, he should sweep streets even as Michelangelo painted, or Beethoven composed music, or Shakespeare wrote poetry. He should sweep streets so well that all the hosts of heaven and earth will pause to say, here lived a great street sweeper who did his job well.” I am not worried about the job the street sweepers do—they do it well-but how well do Aldermen perform? Since, according to data collected by Dick Simpson, Professor of Political Science at the University of Illinois, more than 30 Aldermen since 1971 have been convicted in political corruption cases (about 20% of those elected to City Council during that period); the job they are doing enriches themselves, not the people of Chicago. I guess the hosts of heaven and earth won’t pause to say Aldermen did their job well.

5 comments:

  1. Jason writes:

    "Use of jumping jacks is controlled by the office of special events and not on a ward by ward basis. Applications are typically available at the ward offices as a convenience, but the process is done by special events.

    I only know this because I get them every year. Last year they didn't take applications til real late because the program was in jeopardy of closure."

    ReplyDelete
  2. Kelly writes:

    "I like yours today on the city's streets & san!"

    ReplyDelete
  3. Fan Club President Sue writes:

    "Well said!"

    ReplyDelete
  4. Kathy, I LOVE the picture with this blog. TERRIFIC. You have an amazing mind. I am in awe.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Editor Bob Maneiwth writes:

    "Some comments on your blog:



    Schakowsky’s husband, Robert Creamer, pled guilty in 2006 to failing to pay withholding taxes and bank fraud involving check kiting -- writing checks on accounts without sufficient funds to cover them while moving money between accounts and playing the so-called float to prevent the checks from bouncing and served time in prison.



    This sentence is too long. It could have been split into two easily. Otherwise, moving a modifier would make it clearer.

    Schakowsky’s husband, Robert Creamer, pled guilty in 2006 and served time in prison for to failing to pay withholding taxes and bank fraud involving check kiting -- writing checks on accounts without sufficient funds to cover them while moving money between accounts and playing the so-called float to prevent the checks from bouncing.



    Here’s another sentence that should (have been) rearranged for clarity:



    She recently proposed a $100 million Illinois bail out of ShoreBank (not in her district) which would be the first-ever state bank bail out in history. She did not propose anything like that when the Bank of Lincolnwood failed last year and it IS located in her district!



    And how it should read:



    She recently proposed a $100 million Illinois bail out of ShoreBank (not in her district) which would be the first-ever state bank bail out in history. She did not propose anything like that when the Bank of Lincolnwood, located in her district, failed last year and it IS!



    As to Republican representation of some of Schakowsky’s district, before the lines were re-drawn in 1980, the North Shore 10th District came as far south as the 50th ward here in Chicago and included all of Evanston, etc. Don Rumsfeld was elected from that district in 1962 and three more times after that. (Interestingly enough, after Rumsfeld left Congress to work in the Nixon White House, Ab Mikva represented the district. He had moved from the far South Side to the North Shore when it became apparent that his old district, the 2nd, was going to be represented by an African-American, as it is now by Jesse Jackson, Jr.

    ReplyDelete